PDA

View Full Version : What would you do if Bush is re-elected? (US citizens only)


Coolboyman
15th March 2004, 01:25 AM
IMO he really messed up the US, if it happens im moving to the UK and look into the job at rare, id miss my family but it would be better than being ruled by Bush. "Hey come on in for an interview!" - Some guy at rare

cyberen
15th March 2004, 04:09 AM
That's exactly what I was thinking of doing. Rareware all the way, baby!

Or live in Australia's Canada, New Zealand.

Or stay here and fight the good fight.

P.S. it's not really "re-election", cause Bush was never elected in the first place.

P.o.t.O
15th March 2004, 05:37 AM
Well, Most likely...I'll live of RWPF Punch and spend my life on this message board, like I always do.

Hakey Wake
15th March 2004, 03:31 PM
I would continue to make pointless posts in topics that i'm not allowed in. :)

banjosrevenge
16th March 2004, 07:41 PM
I would not care becuase it's not like any of the other pleople runing are any better

Gold Jinjo
16th March 2004, 08:03 PM
Originally posted by banjosrevenge
I would not care becuase it's not like any of the other pleople runing are any better

What country doesn't have a prize collection of losers running for president/prime minister/what have you...? :)

Icy Guy
16th March 2004, 10:48 PM
Originally posted by Coolboyman
IMO he really messed up the US, if it happens im moving to the UK and look into the job at rare, id miss my family but it would be better than being ruled by Bush.

Would it? Last I heard, Blair just does what Bush says, so in order to really escape Dubya, you'd have to move to Canada or something. Or maybe France or Germany. Or, if you want to avoid food with MSG, move to China.

Professor X
16th March 2004, 11:19 PM
I actually think Bush has been doing better than alot of people could be doing. Am I saying he's doing the best? No. But I think he could do better than John Kerry. He looks a little suspicious to me. Must be that ugly haircut.

R Hunter
17th March 2004, 04:47 AM
I'd cry but since I can finally vote this year hopefully that won't happen:D

Hakey Wake
17th March 2004, 03:23 PM
Originally posted by Icy Guy
Would it? Last I heard, Blair just does what Bush says, so in order to really escape Dubya, you'd have to move to Canada or something. Or maybe France or Germany. Or, if you want to avoid food with MSG, move to China.

Yes that's what Blair does.

And even though we have our own Parliament now, England STILL try to issue orders for our country.

So the UK isn't much better. :)

golden jiggy
20th March 2004, 05:45 PM
Yes that's what Blair does.

And even though we have our own Parliament now, England STILL try to issue orders for our country.

So the UK isn't much better. :)

Which part of the UK do you hail from then?


Coolboyman, if your trying to get away from Bush, do not, i repeat DO NOT go to England. Go somewhere nice, like a desert Island.

(Sorry, I'm not a US citezen, but i replied anyway.)

Hakey Wake
20th March 2004, 10:28 PM
Which part of the UK do you hail from then?

Scotland, and proud of it. :cool:

R Hunter
22nd March 2004, 10:07 PM
from what I heard on CNN today Bush knew about the 9/11 attack before it happend
my question is... CNN's just figuring THAT out now?!

SubDrag
23rd March 2004, 02:03 AM
Don't believe everything you hear...there's so much on the airwaves, you can stop 99 out of 100 terrorist attacks, but one will get through, and that one will be devastating.

cyberen
25th March 2004, 05:38 PM
I actually think Bush has been doing better than alot of people could be doing. Am I saying he's doing the best? No. But I think he could do better than John Kerry. He looks a little suspicious to me. Must be that ugly haircut.

um, you know, Professor, haircuts aren't important. Looks aren't important. The evidence from the past of who is a better leader is important.

and of course 9-11 could have been prevented, but it was used to boost the president's ratings and "justify" an invasion campaign in the middle east. Tell me, shouldn't the 9-11 investigation happen right after 9-11, then once they figured out what went wrong, the officials can make all the new departments and new laws? Why was bush so against the probe a year ago and now he's not? If such an attack was easily preventable, why do we need these laws that invade our privacy and throw away the constitution?

Hakey Wake
25th March 2004, 08:19 PM
from what I heard on CNN today Bush knew about the 9/11 attack before it happend
my question is... CNN's just figuring THAT out now?!

Yeah for a heavily democraticly based Network you'd think they'd have been all over this 'fact' ages ago wouldn't you?

cyberen
26th March 2004, 06:51 PM
well they obviously had more important things to do, like explain the complex constuction of Saddam's spider hole. :rolleyes:

Hakey Wake
26th March 2004, 09:42 PM
Did anybody actually care about that btw?