#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Is there any reason (that you know of) why Rare "DEFINITELY" wasn't going to make Conker? Is it because Microsoft doesn't trust in their abilities or because they were too busy (which I doubt, since they had just finished KSR)? Last edited by Salty Hippo; 6th March 2015 at 01:36 AM. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
A little of column A and a little of column B. Most of what we know as Rare isn't the same Rare from the N64 days, a lot of the key players left. With that said, Rare is a talented group of people, but with the Conker reboot they weren't sure Rare was up to the challenge. They thought Insomniac would've been a better fit to get a product out by the end of the year.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
1. Was the development time the only thing that made Insomniac refuse? Like, would it have been a done deal had MS offered more time? 2. Do you know what exactly was Microsoft's angle when they demanded Conker to be out by 2015? How exactly would that have helped other Rare IP? Why not start reintroducing these franchises with Banjo, for instance? 3. Was there any talk of a Battletoads game, or any other Rare IP that they thought had potential in the future? Blast Corps, Jet Force Gemini, Kameo, Viva Piñata, or any other. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
But, here's a question anyway (or a demand): do you know anything else about the plans for the Banjo game other than a scheduled release date? If so, spill the beans.
__________________
"I'm a loser and like to take things out of context." ~ Jinjonator |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
2. Conker would've been the soft push to getting these old Rare IPs out the door, particularly Banjo. Banjo was something that MS wasn't ready to tackle just yet, and the development of that and Perfect Dark really depended on Conker. Conker seemed like the easiest game to develop because A) Banjo was going to be facing huge fan expectations and MS wanted to know if Insomniac could handle it with Conker and B) Perfect Dark was lower on the priority list because the shooter market has become oversaturated recently. I mean, nothing was set in stone, it's not like the order was always going to be: Conker, then Banjo, then PD, but Conker was always going to take the lead. 3. Blast Corps is a big no, JFG never had anything serious in the works, Kameo no, Battletoads and Viva Piñata?.... Quote:
With Banjo nothing was set in stone aside from that it was going to be a reboot, and that it wasn't going to be as a radical departure from the originals like Nuts and Bolts was. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the answers. We can't be 100% sure you're who you say you are, but so far it doesn't look like a prank.
One more if you will: - Kampfheld on Neogaf mentioned that you were right on 2 things, wrong in 1. And he said you probably took a guess on that thing that you are supposedly wrong about. Can you imagine what is the thing he's thinking of? Is there anything in particular on your Reddit post that you feel you took a long shot at? Last edited by Salty Hippo; 6th March 2015 at 02:57 AM. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Last one:
- When exactly did you leave MS, and before you left did you manage to catch a glimpse for what Rare is working on themselves? Is it a new IP? Is it Kinect? Is it HoloLens? Do you know anything at all about what those guys are actually working on? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
As for what Rare was working on, I don't want to spill all the beans. I've actually been really frustrated with a lot of things while I was working at MS so I don't mind talking about that stuff. With Rare, I was on good terms with them, so I'd rather leave their surprises be... you'll appreciate it more that way, trust me. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
This makes me really feel that HoloLens is part of at least one of their projects.
Appreciate the answers. Hopefully you'll stick around a bit more so that more people can ask questions. |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
With the failure of Conker being rebooted, I hope they go ahead and try to do Banjo anyway. Oh well, we'll see
__________________
"Being the Bara King that you are." ~Smouvy
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
I can stick around for a little while longer to answer questions, for sure.
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Thanks for answering all the questions, whether or not you are who you claim to be.
__________________
"I'm a loser and like to take things out of context." ~ Jinjonator |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I do have one fun story. One day I show up at work and there's this paper in my inbox of Conker as a tree. It was a regular cartoonish tree, but with Conker's face in the middle. It looked really professional, like someone had spent hours making it. I asked around and a bunch of my coworkers thought it was funny, but didn't know where it came from. Usually, if it's something like concept art, it's tagged and labelled clearly, but this one wasn't. I kept thinking it was a piece of fan art, but I haven't been able to find it online. Besides, who draws something as random as that? Not really relevant, but I thought it was funny. |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Certain_ability, can you private message me proof that you are who you say you are?
__________________
|
|
|