The RWP

StevethemasterX · #46 28th August 2007, 11:04 PM

really, i thought he said he was leaving tomorow.

darn, i know he'll be back though

runehero123 · #47 28th August 2007, 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StevethemasterX

it was complete april fools... dont take it seriously.

Or it was reverse psychollogy into making you think it was an april fools joke. Some of it may have been, but the egg's being added on later seem reasonable enough.

StevethemasterX · #48 28th August 2007, 11:32 PM

nah, i doubt it

ssj · #49 29th August 2007, 12:20 AM

I think fox will try his best to make an appearence in the next few days due to the discovery. But for now there's only 3 of us left to hack out sns.

We really do need more members.

BloodXP · #50 29th August 2007, 03:06 AM

There's really not enough good hackers on this forum, I for one fail miserably at it. Maybe sub or ice should join in and help? They are pretty accomplished in the field and after all it is there forum.

yamibakuragod · #51 29th August 2007, 04:21 AM

I've been trying to learn, but school just totally takes me out of the picture. Honestly good hackers are hard to come by on any forum, we need to look for new members to the TB forums.

BanjoPL · #52 29th August 2007, 07:59 AM

Some theories:

Possible secret level in Banjo-Kazooie:
-Advent level
-Hammerhead Beach

Possible secret level in Banjo-Tooie:
-Gruntilda's Lair(Tower Room)
-Glowbo Cave
-Ridiculously Secret Area 1
-Hammerhead Beach transfered from Banjo-Kazooie
-unknown level transfered from Banjo-Kazooie

Fox McBanjo · #53 29th August 2007, 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StevethemasterX

really, i thought he said he was leaving tomorow.

darn, i know he'll be back though

Oh, I'm still here alright.

In spirit.

firealpha · #54 29th August 2007, 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fox McBanjo

In spitit.

Spit what?

Fox McBanjo · #55 29th August 2007, 02:28 PM

*Sprit.

firealpha · #56 29th August 2007, 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fox McBanjo

*Sprit.

A pole extending diagonally across a fore-and-aft sail from the lower part of the mast to the peak of the sail.

Fox McBanjo · #57 29th August 2007, 02:48 PM

DAMNIT.

Spirit!

firealpha · #58 29th August 2007, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fox McBanjo

Spirit!

Congrats. You finally got it.

FAKE EDIT: Post 600. And it's pretty much spam.

AndyNPC · #59 29th August 2007, 04:32 PM

If I recall, Nintendo didn't allow sns to become finished because it could potentially damage the Rambus memory in a failed swop. But sense they have a patten on it, that must of meant that sns was tested and came out successful. So, if Rare got it to work then there is still a chance that data to "stop 'n' swop" is still in either BK or DK64. But, Nintendo didn't like the idea of hot or cold swoping. If a lock on cartridge was developed, unlicensed products could be attached to the cartridge in order to cancel out the lock out chip in the N64, not to mention that it would raise costs for cartridge production. If the idea of ripping out the game and putting in another was used, well, that could cause many unwanted problems. So Nintendo gave the thumbs down. "But, what about the test?" you ask? Well, at some point Rare had tested it and it worked. But it also brought problems, the Rambus memory could be corrupted in a bad swop. So to make sure there wasn't any compliants, Nintendo had Rare remove the program.

But there is hope! That last part might not be true, the test data may still exist. If Rare was as lazy as they always were then they never removed the actual link between BK and DK64. So it may be possible to actually change something in DK64 from BK legally! We just don't know how, when, or even what to look for. It could be just one small value changed even.

An interesting theroy, don't you think?

runehero123 · #60 29th August 2007, 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyNPC

The Rambus memory could be corrupted in a bad swop. So to make sure there wasn't any compliants, Nintendo had Rare remove the program.

As stated in the Rare patent, there would be an algorithm in place that would make sure the data wasn't corrupted before it is loaded into the system. The problem with hot-swapping though is the possibility of some retard placing a different game in the n64 that wasn't supposed to be swapped with the previous game. However, that problem most likely wouldn't exist during cold-swapping. The method was cold swapping by the way.

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyNPC

If the idea of ripping out the game and putting in another was used, well, that could cause many unwanted problems. So Nintendo gave the thumbs down.

Not if the system was "off" while doing so, you do it all the time.

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyPC

If a lock on cartridge was developed, unlicensed products could be attached to the cartridge in order to cancel out the lock out chip in the N64, not to mention that it would raise costs for cartridge production

Couldn't unlicensed products directly attach to the n64 and cancel out that lock out chip anyways?